↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of action of emodepside

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of action of emodepside
Published in
Parasitology Research, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00436-005-1438-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Harder, L. Holden–Dye, R. Walker, F. Wunderlich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Chemistry 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#621
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,515
of 59,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.