↓ Skip to main content

Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10071-004-0251-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerrie P. Lewis, Sarah Jaffe, Elizabeth M. Brannon

Abstract

A wealth of data demonstrating that monkeys and apes represent number have been interpreted as suggesting that sensitivity to number emerged early in primate evolution, if not before. Here we examine the numerical capacities of the mongoose lemur (Eulemur mongoz), a member of the prosimian suborder of primates that split from the common ancestor of monkeys, apes and humans approximately 47-54 million years ago. Subjects observed as an experimenter sequentially placed grapes into an opaque bucket. On half of the trials the experimenter placed a subset of the grapes into a false bottom such that they were inaccessible to the lemur. The critical question was whether lemurs would spend more time searching the bucket when food should have remained in the bucket, compared to when they had retrieved all of the food. We found that the amount of time lemurs spent searching was indicative of whether grapes should have remained in the bucket, and furthermore that lemur search time reliably differentiated numerosities that differed by a 1:2 ratio, but not those that differed by a 2:3 or 3:4 ratio. Finally, two control conditions determined that lemurs represented the number of food items, and neither the odor of the grapes, nor the amount of grape (e.g., area) in the bucket. These results suggest that mongoose lemurs have numerical representations that are modulated by Weber's Law.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 34%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,111,462
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#693
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,965
of 141,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.