| Title |
Comparative genomics and systematics of Betaphycus, Eucheuma, and Kappaphycus (Solieriaceae: Rhodophyta) based on mitochondrial genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-018-1450-1 |
| Authors |
Yue Li, Na Liu, Xumin Wang, Xianming Tang, Lei Zhang, Maria Dyah Nur Meinita, Guoliang Wang, Hongxin Yin, Yuemei Jin, Haiyang Wang, Cui Liu, Shan Chi, Tao Liu, Jing Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,948,821
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1,053
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,365
of 327,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#26
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.