↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation Science in Context

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Rehabilitation Science in Context'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 186 Preoperative Rehabilitation in Lung Cancer Patients: Yoga Approach
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 187 Improvement in Gait Pattern After Knee Arthroplasty Followed by Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Physiotherapy
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 188 Perspective on Broad-Acting Clinical Physiological Effects of Photobiomodulation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 189 Copeptin Blood Content as a Diagnostic Marker of Chronic Kidney Disease
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 190 Next-Generation Sequencing of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Mixed-Genotype Infections in Anti-HCV-Negative Blood Donors
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 191 Psychological Determinants of Attitude Toward Euthanasia: A Comparative Study of Female Nurses and Female Nonmedical Professionals
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 192 Effects of Breast and Prostate Cancer Metastases on Lumbar Spine Biomechanics: Rapid In Silico Evaluation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 193 Does Patient-Specific Instrumentation Improve Femoral and Tibial Component Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Randomized Study
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 196 Relation Between Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and IgE-Dependent Allergy in Pediatric Patients
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 197 Bioactive Oleic Derivatives of Dopamine: A Review of the Therapeutic Potential
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 209 Novel Model of Somatosensory Nerve Transfer in the Rat
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 210 The Timing of Rehabilitation Commencement After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Attention for Chapter 209: Novel Model of Somatosensory Nerve Transfer in the Rat
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Novel Model of Somatosensory Nerve Transfer in the Rat
Chapter number 209
Book title
Rehabilitation Science in Context
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_209
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-995707-4, 978-3-31-995708-1
Authors

Adriana M. Paskal, Wiktor Paskal, Kacper Pelka, Martyna Podobinska, Jaroslaw Andrychowski, Pawel K. Wlodarski, Paskal, Adriana M., Paskal, Wiktor, Pelka, Kacper, Podobinska, Martyna, Andrychowski, Jaroslaw, Wlodarski, Pawel K.

Abstract

Nerve transfer (neurotization) is a reconstructive procedure in which the distal denervated nerve is joined with a proximal healthy nerve of a less significant function. Neurotization models described to date are limited to avulsed roots or pure motor nerve transfers, neglecting the clinically significant mixed nerve transfer. Our aim was to determine whether femoral-to-sciatic nerve transfer could be a feasible model of mixed nerve transfer. Three Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to unilateral femoral-to-sciatic nerve transfer. After 50 days, functional recovery was evaluated with a prick test. At the same time, axonal tracers were injected into each sciatic nerve distally to the lesion site, to determine nerve fibers' regeneration. In the prick test, the rats retracted their hind limbs after stimulation, although the reaction was moderately weaker on the operated side. Seven days after injection of axonal tracers, dyes were visualized by confocal microscopy in the spinal cord. Innervation of the recipient nerve originated from higher segments of the spinal cord than that on the untreated side. The results imply that the femoral nerve axons, ingrown into the damaged sciatic nerve, reinnervate distal targets with a functional outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Neuroscience 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,594,543
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,903
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,138
of 442,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#61
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.