↓ Skip to main content

Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00404-008-0731-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Nama, Isaac Manyonda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Postgraduate 17 17%
Other 7 7%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#535
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,793
of 83,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.