| Title |
PET scan findings can be false positive
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-015-1308-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Safaie, R. Matthews, R. Bergamaschi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
| Engineering | 3 | 14% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#986
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,654
of 265,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.