↓ Skip to main content

Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life
Published in
Human Nature, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s12110-004-1010-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd K. Shackelford, Martin Voracek, David P. Schmitt, David M. Buss, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford, Richard L. Michalski

Abstract

Young men are more distressed by a partner's sexual infidelity, whereas young women are more distressed by a partner's emotional infidelity. The present research investigated (a) whether the sex difference in jealousy replicates in an older sample, and (b) whether younger people differ from older people in their selection of the more distressing infidelity scenario. We presented forced-choice dilemmas to 202 older people (mean age = 67 years) and to 234 younger people (mean age = 20 years). The sex difference replicated in the older sample. In addition, older women were less likely than younger women to select a partner's emotional infidelity as more distressing than a partner's sexual infidelity. Discussion offers directions for future work on sex differences and age differences in jealousy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 113 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Professor 11 9%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,030,595
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#109
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,077
of 59,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.