↓ Skip to main content

All-cause mortality in a nationwide cohort of childhood-onset diabetes in Norway 1973–2013

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
All-cause mortality in a nationwide cohort of childhood-onset diabetes in Norway 1973–2013
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00125-015-3623-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vibeke Gagnum, Lars C. Stene, Leiv Sandvik, Morten W. Fagerland, Pål R. Njølstad, Geir Joner, Torild Skrivarhaug

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the association between all-cause mortality and sex, age at diagnosis and year of diagnosis in Norwegian patients with childhood-onset diabetes. The study was based on the nationwide, population-based Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry, which includes all newly diagnosed cases of childhood-onset diabetes at age 0-14 years in 1973-1982 and 1989-2012 (n = 7,884). Patients were followed until date of death, emigration or 30 September 2013. Among the 7,884 patients, representing 132,420 person-years, 249 (3.2%) died during a mean follow-up of 16.8 (range 0.0-40.7) years. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) for the total cohort was 3.6 (95% CI 3.1, 4.0), increasing by attained age. Absolute mortality was significantly lower in females than in males (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.38, 0.65]), although the SMRs were similar. Cox regression analysis showed a significant decrease in mortality of 49% (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.28, 0.93]) for those diagnosed in 1999-2012 compared with those diagnosed in 1973-1982 (p = 0.03). In spite of improved diabetes care, mortality is still three to four times higher in those with childhood-onset diabetes compared with the general population in Norway. However, absolute mortality has declined among children diagnosed most recently (1999-2012) compared with those diagnosed in the earliest period (1973-1982).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,760,015
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,616
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,395
of 264,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#63
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.