↓ Skip to main content

Negative Cognitive Bias and Perceived Stress: Independent Mediators of the Relation Between Mindfulness and Emotional Distress

Overview of attention for article published in Mindfulness, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Negative Cognitive Bias and Perceived Stress: Independent Mediators of the Relation Between Mindfulness and Emotional Distress
Published in
Mindfulness, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12671-018-0955-7
Authors

Cameron G. Ford, Natalie J. Shook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,817,224
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#502
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,970
of 326,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.