↓ Skip to main content

Effects of reactive oxygen species and interplay of antioxidants during physical exercise in skeletal muscles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Effects of reactive oxygen species and interplay of antioxidants during physical exercise in skeletal muscles
Published in
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13105-018-0633-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Thirupathi, Ricardo A. Pinho

Abstract

A large number of researches have led to a substantial growth of knowledge about exercise and oxidative stress. Initial investigations reported that physical exercise generates free radical-mediated damages to cells; however, in recent years, studies have shown that regular exercise can upregulate endogenous antioxidants and reduce oxidative damage. Yet, strenuous exercise perturbs the antioxidant system by increasing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) content. These alterations in the cellular environment seem to occur in an exercise type-dependent manner. The source of ROS generation during exercise is debatable, but now it is well established that both contracting and relaxing skeletal muscles generate reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species. In particular, exercises of higher intensity and longer duration can cause oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and nucleotides in myocytes. In this review, we summarize the ROS effects and interplay of antioxidants in skeletal muscle during physical exercise. Additionally, we discuss how ROS-mediated signaling influences physical exercise in antioxidant system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 32 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,655,613
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#66
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,954
of 326,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them