| Title |
Detecting oxidative post-translational modifications in proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Amino Acids, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00726-006-0410-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Gianazza, J. Crawford, I. Miller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#495
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,266
of 66,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.