↓ Skip to main content

Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Pain (03043959), January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3052 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1514 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Published in
Pain (03043959), January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, John T. Farrar, Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite, Mark P. Jensen, Nathaniel P. Katz, Robert D. Kerns, Gerold Stucki, Robert R. Allen, Nicholas Bellamy, Daniel B. Carr, Julie Chandler, Penney Cowan, Raymond Dionne, Bradley S. Galer, Sharon Hertz, Alejandro R. Jadad, Lynn D. Kramer, Donald C. Manning, Susan Martin, Cynthia G. McCormick, Michael P. McDermott, Patrick McGrath, Steve Quessy, Bob A. Rappaport, Wendye Robbins, James P. Robinson, Margaret Rothman, Mike A. Royal, Lee Simon, Joseph W. Stauffer, Wendy Stein, Jane Tollett, Joachim Wernicke, James Witter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 <1%
United States 9 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1464 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 219 14%
Researcher 214 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 205 14%
Student > Bachelor 128 8%
Other 125 8%
Other 352 23%
Unknown 271 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 523 35%
Psychology 202 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 152 10%
Neuroscience 64 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 3%
Other 182 12%
Unknown 341 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#938,470
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#441
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,746
of 153,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#3
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.