↓ Skip to main content

Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with osteosarcoma treated with amputation versus limb-salvage surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with osteosarcoma treated with amputation versus limb-salvage surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00402-014-2086-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiong Mei, Xiao-Zhong Zhu, Zhi-Yuan Wang, Xuan-Song Cai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#880
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,733
of 263,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.