You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shane Allwright, Gillian Paul, Birgit Greiner, Bernie J Mullally, Lisa Pursell, Alan Kelly, Brendan Bonner, Maureen D'Eath, Bill McConnell, James P McLaughlin, Diarmuid O'Donovan, Eamon O'Kane, Ivan J Perry |
| Abstract |
To compare exposure to secondhand smoke and respiratory health in bar staff in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland before and after the introduction of legislation for smoke-free workplaces in the Republic. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,019,057
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#18,424
of 64,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,321
of 70,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#42
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.