You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends in Rocky Mountain amphibians and the role of beaver as a keystone species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.005 |
| Authors |
Blake R. Hossack, William R. Gould, Debra A. Patla, Erin Muths, Rob Daley, Kristin Legg, Paul Stephen Corn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 41 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,074
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,085
of 277,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.