↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for generalized hyperalgesia in chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for generalized hyperalgesia in chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10067-009-1339-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mira Meeus, Jo Nijs, Sven Huybrechts, Steven Truijen

Abstract

Several studies provided evidence for generalized hyperalgesia in fibromyalgia or whiplash-associated disorders. In chronic fatigue syndrome, however, pain is a frequently reported complaint, but up to now, evidence for generalized hyperalgesia is lacking. The aim of this study is to examine whether the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at both symptomatic and asymptomatic sites differ in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients with chronic pain, compared to healthy controls. Therefore, 30 CFS patients with chronic pain and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls indicated on a Margolis Pain Diagram where they felt pain lasting longer than 24 h in the past 4 weeks. After completing a test battery of questionnaires evaluating pain cognitions, functional status and symptomatology, a blinded researcher assessed PPTs bilaterally at seven nonspecific sites on both trunk and extremities. PPTs were compared for the two complete groups. In addition, PPTs of patients and controls who did not report pain in a respective zone were compared. PPTs of the patients were significantly lower (p<0.001) compared to those of the control group, also when pain-free samples per zone were compared (p<0.001). The mean PPT was 3.30 kg/cm2 in all CFS patients and 8.09 kg/cm2 in the controls. No confounding factors responsible for the observed differences, as, e.g., catastrophizing and depression, could be revealed. These findings provide evidence for the existence of hyperalgesia even in asymptomatic areas (generalized secondary hyperalgesia). The generalized hyperalgesia may represent the involvement of a sensitized central nervous system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 27%
Psychology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,835,776
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#381
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,278
of 164,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.