↓ Skip to main content

Using a Prerequisite Skills Assessment to Identify Optimal Modalities for Mand Training

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Analysis in Practice, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Using a Prerequisite Skills Assessment to Identify Optimal Modalities for Mand Training
Published in
Behavior Analysis in Practice, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40617-018-0256-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber L. Valentino, Linda A. LeBlanc, Sarah E. Veazey, Lauren A. Weaver, Paige B. Raetz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 32%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#403
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,964
of 327,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.