| Title |
Recycling of WEEE plastics: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10163-014-0241-2 |
| Authors |
Alfons Buekens, Jie Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 88 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 56 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 122 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#33
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,073
of 241,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them