| Title |
Erratum to: Evolutionary trends of European bat lyssavirus type 2 including genetic characterization of Finnish strains of human and bat origin 24 years apart
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-015-2475-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miia Jakava-Viljanen, Tiina Nokireki, Tarja Sironen, Olli Vapalahti, Liisa Sihvonen, Anita Huovilainen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,412,793
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#3,029
of 4,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,804
of 267,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#31
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.