↓ Skip to main content

Computing moment-to-moment BOLD activation for real-time neurofeedback

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computing moment-to-moment BOLD activation for real-time neurofeedback
Published in
NeuroImage, August 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Hinds, Satrajit Ghosh, Todd W. Thompson, Julie J. Yoo, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Christina Triantafyllou, John D.E. Gabrieli

Abstract

Estimating moment-to-moment changes in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activation levels from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data has applications for learned regulation of regional activation, brain state monitoring, and brain-machine interfaces. In each of these contexts, accurate estimation of the BOLD signal in as little time as possible is desired. This is a challenging problem due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of fMRI data. Previous methods for real-time fMRI analysis have either sacrificed the ability to compute moment-to-moment activation changes by averaging several acquisitions into a single activation estimate or have sacrificed accuracy by failing to account for prominent sources of noise in the fMRI signal. Here we present a new method for computing the amount of activation present in a single fMRI acquisition that separates moment-to-moment changes in the fMRI signal intensity attributable to neural sources from those due to noise, resulting in a feedback signal more reflective of neural activation. This method computes an incremental general linear model fit to the fMRI time series, which is used to calculate the expected signal intensity at each new acquisition. The difference between the measured intensity and the expected intensity is scaled by the variance of the estimator in order to transform this residual difference into a statistic. Both synthetic and real data were used to validate this method and compare it to the only other published real-time fMRI method.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
United Kingdom 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 171 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 27%
Researcher 51 26%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 27%
Neuroscience 35 18%
Engineering 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Computer Science 19 10%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 18 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,161,251
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#1,657
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,675
of 103,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#9
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.