↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive meta-analysis reveals association between multiple imprinting disorders and conception by assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Comprehensive meta-analysis reveals association between multiple imprinting disorders and conception by assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10815-018-1173-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria K. Cortessis, Moosa Azadian, James Buxbaum, Fatimata Sanogo, Ashley Y. Song, Intira Sriprasert, Pengxiao C. Wei, Jing Yu, Karine Chung, Kimberly D. Siegmund

Abstract

To determine whether a history of conception by assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with occurrence of one or more imprinting disorders of either maternal or paternal origin. We implemented a systematic review of scholarly literature followed by comprehensive meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize data from reports relating to use of ART to occurrence of any imprinting disorder of humans, including Beckwith-Wiedemann (BWS), Angelman (AS), Prader-Willi (PWS), and Silver-Russell (SRS) syndromes, as well as transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDB) and sporadic retinoblasoma (RB). The systematic review identified 13 reports presenting unique data from 23 studies that related conception following ART to occurrence of imprinting disorders. Multiple studies of four disorder were identified, for which meta-analysis yielded the following summary estimates of associations with a history of ART: AS, summary odds ratio (sOR) = 4.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-8.5, 4 studies); BWS, sOR = 5.8 (95% CI 3.1-11.1, 8 studies); PWS, sOR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-3.0, 6 studies); SRS, sOR = 11.3 (95% CI 4.5-28.5, 3 studies). Only one study reported on each of TNDB and RB. Published data reveal positive associations between history of ART conception and each of four imprinting disorders. Reasons for these associations warrant further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,372,493
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#418
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,819
of 330,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.