↓ Skip to main content

Sociodemographic Risk Factors for Autism in a US Metropolitan Area

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Sociodemographic Risk Factors for Autism in a US Metropolitan Area
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0194-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Karapurkar Bhasin, Diana Schendel

Abstract

The present study examined the association between autism and sociodemographic factors, overall and in subgroups of children with autism with and without mental retardation (Autism/MR and Autism/No MR, respectively); the association was further examined in subanalyses by child's source of ascertainment to assess the presence of ascertainment bias. In the main analyses, one marker of higher social class (higher median family income) was significantly associated with autism overall. Both markers of higher social class (higher maternal education and higher median family income) were significantly associated with autism/no MR, but not associated with autism/MR. In the subanalyses, associations with social class varied by ascertainment source. Future studies should consider phenotypic subgroups of children with autism and must consider potential ascertainment bias.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,635,058
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,188
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,363
of 68,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.