| Title |
The calculation of cumulants via conditioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, December 1969
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02532246 |
| Authors |
David R. Brillinger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 47% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 29% |
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,921,995
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#9
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#820
of 6,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.