↓ Skip to main content

Natural Mutagenesis of Human Genomes by Endogenous Retrotransposons

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
43 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
494 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
467 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural Mutagenesis of Human Genomes by Endogenous Retrotransposons
Published in
Cell, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca C. Iskow, Michael T. McCabe, Ryan E. Mills, Spencer Torene, W. Stephen Pittard, Andrew F. Neuwald, Erwin G. Van Meir, Paula M. Vertino, Scott E. Devine

Abstract

Two abundant classes of mobile elements, namely Alu and L1 elements, continue to generate new retrotransposon insertions in human genomes. Estimates suggest that these elements have generated millions of new germline insertions in individual human genomes worldwide. Unfortunately, current technologies are not capable of detecting most of these young insertions, and the true extent of germline mutagenesis by endogenous human retrotransposons has been difficult to examine. Here, we describe technologies for detecting these young retrotransposon insertions and demonstrate that such insertions indeed are abundant in human populations. We also found that new somatic L1 insertions occur at high frequencies in human lung cancer genomes. Genome-wide analysis suggests that altered DNA methylation may be responsible for the high levels of L1 mobilization observed in these tumors. Our data indicate that transposon-mediated mutagenesis is extensive in human genomes and is likely to have a major impact on human biology and diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
France 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 425 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 131 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 22%
Student > Master 41 9%
Professor 29 6%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Other 82 18%
Unknown 51 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 233 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 114 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 2%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 20 4%
Unknown 59 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,140,008
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#4,144
of 17,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,413
of 109,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#11
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.