↓ Skip to main content

Reduced Variability of Postural Strategy Prevents Normalization of Motor Changes Induced by Back Pain: A Risk Factor for Chronic Trouble?

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduced Variability of Postural Strategy Prevents Normalization of Motor Changes Induced by Back Pain: A Risk Factor for Chronic Trouble?
Published in
Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2006
DOI 10.1037/0735-7044.120.2.474
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Lorimer Moseley, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

Variability is fundamental to biological systems and is important in posturomotor learning and control. Pain induces a protective postural strategy, although variability is normally preserved. If variability is lost, does the normal postural strategy return when pain stops? Sixteen subjects performed arm movements during control trials, when the movement evoked back pain and then when it did not. Variability in the postural strategy of the abdominal muscles and pain-related cognitions were evaluated. Only those subjects for whom pain induced a reduction in variability of the postural strategy failed to return to a normal strategy when pain stopped. They were also characterized by their pain-related cognitions. Ongoing perception of threat to the back may exert tighter evaluative control over variability of the postural strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 229 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 66 27%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 13%
Sports and Recreations 27 11%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Engineering 11 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,112,324
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Neuroscience
#79
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,159
of 84,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them