↓ Skip to main content

Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk
Published in
Conservation Genetics, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10592-009-0013-z
Authors

Kris J. Hundertmark, Larry J. Van Daele

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 150 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 9 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 65%
Environmental Science 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#464
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,400
of 165,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.