↓ Skip to main content

Liposomal Amphotericin B

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Liposomal Amphotericin B
Published in
Drugs, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marit D. Moen, Katherine A. Lyseng-Williamson, Lesley J. Scott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 257 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 76 29%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 7%
Chemistry 17 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,511
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,665
of 189,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#562
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.