| Title |
An analysis of immediate serial recall performance in a macaque
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-009-0226-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew M. Botvinick, Jun Wang, Elizabeth Cowan, Stephane Roy, Christina Bastianen, J. Patrick Mayo, James C. Houk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,687,906
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#539
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,622
of 97,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.