↓ Skip to main content

About Cognitive Outcome Measures at Ecological Signal-to-Noise Ratios and Cognitive-Driven Hearing Aid Signal Processing

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Audiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
About Cognitive Outcome Measures at Ecological Signal-to-Noise Ratios and Cognitive-Driven Hearing Aid Signal Processing
Published in
American Journal of Audiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1044/2015_aja-14-0066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Lunner

Abstract

To discuss two questions concerning how hearing aids interact with hearing and cognition. Can signal processing in hearing aids improve memory? Can attention be used for top-down control of hearing aids? Memory recall test of heard sentences at signal-to-noise ratios adjusted to 95% correct speech recognition with and without binary mask noise reduction. A short literature review on recent findings on new brain imaging techniques showing potential for hearing aid control. Two experiments indicate that it is possible to show improved memory with an experimental noise reduction algorithm at ecological signal-to-noise ratios and that it is possible to replicate these findings in a new language. The literature indicates that attention-controlled hearing aids may be developed in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Engineering 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,412,793
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Audiology
#672
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,013
of 267,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Audiology
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.