↓ Skip to main content

Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
785 Mendeley
Title
Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli
Published in
Psychopharmacology, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/pl00005483
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Jentsch, J. R. Taylor

Abstract

Drug abuse and dependence define behavioral states involving increased allocation of behavior towards drug seeking and taking at the expense of more appropriate behavioral patterns. As such, addiction can be viewed as increased control of behavior by the desired drug (due to its unconditioned, rewarding properties). It is also clear that drug-associated (conditioned) stimuli acquire heightened abilities to control behaviors. These phenomena have been linked with dopamine function within the ventral striatum and amygdala and have been described specifically in terms of motivational and incentive learning processes. New data are emerging that suggest that regions of the frontal cortex involved in inhibitory response control are directly affected by long-term exposure to drugs of abuse. The result of chronic drug use may be frontal cortical cognitive dysfunction, resulting in an inability to inhibit inappropriate unconditioned or conditioned responses elicited by drugs, by related stimuli or by internal drive states. Drug-seeking behavior may thus be due to two related phenomena: (1) augmented incentive motivational qualities of the drug and associated stimuli (due to limbic/amygdalar dysfunction) and (2) impaired inhibitory control (due to frontal cortical dysfunction). In this review, we consider the neuro-anatomical and neurochemical substrates subserving inhibitory control and motivational processes in the rodent and primate brain and their putative impact on drug seeking. The evidence for cognitive impulsivity in drug abuse associated with dysfunction of the frontostriatal system will be discussed, and an integrative hypothesis for compulsive reward-seeking in drug abuse will be presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 785 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 746 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 187 24%
Researcher 120 15%
Student > Bachelor 99 13%
Student > Master 77 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 7%
Other 152 19%
Unknown 95 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 284 36%
Neuroscience 128 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 2%
Other 55 7%
Unknown 137 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,263,943
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#547
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,379
of 35,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.