↓ Skip to main content

Catecholamines and the Effects of Exercise, Training and Gender

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
389 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
Title
Catecholamines and the Effects of Exercise, Training and Gender
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200838050-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hassane Zouhal, Christophe Jacob, Paul Delamarche, Arlette Gratas-Delamarche

Abstract

Stress hormones, adrenaline (epinephrine) and noradrenaline (norepinephrine), are responsible for many adaptations both at rest and during exercise. Since their discovery, thousands of studies have focused on these two catecholamines and their importance in many adaptive processes to different stressors such as exercise, hypoglycaemia, hypoxia and heat exposure, and these studies are now well acknowledged. In fact, since adrenaline and noradrenaline are the main hormones whose concentrations increase markedly during exercise, many researchers have worked on the effect of exercise on these amines and reported 1.5 to >20 times basal concentrations depending on exercise characteristics (e.g. duration and intensity). Similarly, several studies have shown that adrenaline and noradrenaline are involved in cardiovascular and respiratory adjustments and in substrate mobilization and utilization. Thus, many studies have focused on physical training and gender effects on catecholamine response to exercise in an effort to verify if significant differences in catecholamine responses to exercise could be partly responsible for the different performances observed between trained and untrained subjects and/or men and women. In fact, previous studies conducted in men have used different types of exercise to compare trained and untrained subjects in response to exercise at the same absolute or relative intensity. Their results were conflicting for a while. As research progressed, parameters such as age, nutritional and emotional state have been found to influence catecholamine concentrations. As a result, most of the recent studies have taken into account all these parameters. Those studies also used very well trained subjects and/or more intense exercise, which is known to have a greater effect on catecholamine response so that differences between trained and untrained subjects are more likely to appear. Most findings then reported a higher adrenaline response to exercise in endurance-trained compared with untrained subjects in response to intense exercise at the same relative intensity as all-out exercise. This phenomenon is referred to as the 'sports adrenal medulla'. This higher capacity to secrete adrenaline was observed both in response to physical exercise and to other stimuli such as hypoglycaemia and hypoxia. For some authors, this phenomenon can partly explain the higher physical performance observed in trained compared with untrained subjects. More recently, these findings have also been reported in anaerobic-trained subjects in response to supramaximal exercise. In women, studies remain scarce; the results are more conflicting than in men and the physical training type (aerobic or anaerobic) effects on catecholamine response remain to be specified. Conversely, the works undertaken in animals are more unanimous and suggest that physical training can increase the capacity to secrete adrenaline via an increase of the adrenal gland volume and adrenaline content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 1%
Poland 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 505 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 14%
Student > Bachelor 74 14%
Researcher 37 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 73 14%
Unknown 127 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 133 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 4%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 153 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,038,020
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#895
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,078
of 192,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#114
of 831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.