↓ Skip to main content

Social-Cognitive and Behavioral Correlates of Aggression and Victimization in Boys' Play Groups

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Social-Cognitive and Behavioral Correlates of Aggression and Victimization in Boys' Play Groups
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1022695601088
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Schwartz, Kenneth A. Dodge, John D. Coie, Julie A. Hubbard, Antonius H. N. Cillessen, Elizabeth A. Lemerise, Helen Bateman

Abstract

A contrived play group procedure was utilized to examine the behavioral and social-cognitive correlates of reactive aggression, proactive aggression, and victimization via peers. Eleven play groups, each of which consisted of six familiar African-American 8-year-old boys, met for 45-min sessions on five consecutive days. Social-cognitive interviews were conducted following the second and fourth sessions. Play group interactions were videotaped and examined by trained observers. High rates of proactive aggression were associated with positive outcome expectancies for aggression/assertion, frequent displays of assertive social behavior, and low rates of submissive behavior. Reactive aggression was associated with hostile attributional tendencies and frequent victimization by peers. Victimization was associated with submissive behavior, hostile attributional bias, reactive aggression, and negative outcome expectations for aggression/assertion. These results demonstrate that there is a theoretically coherent and empirically distinct set of correlates associated with each of the examined aggression subtypes, and with victimization by peers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 105 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 24%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 6 5%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 60%
Social Sciences 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Linguistics 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#883
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,477
of 109,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them