You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accommodating Dynamic Oceanographic Processes and Pelagic Biodiversity in Marine Conservation Planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016552 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hedley S. Grantham, Edward T. Game, Amanda T. Lombard, Alistair J. Hobday, Anthony J. Richardson, Lynnath E. Beckley, Robert L. Pressey, Jenny A. Huggett, Janet C. Coetzee, Carl D. van der Lingen, Samantha L. Petersen, Dagmar Merkle, Hugh P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 246 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 28% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,875
of 194,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,332
of 182,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#608
of 1,258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.