| Title |
The nomenclatural status, ontogeny and morphology of Pholidoteuthis massyae (Pfeffer, 1912) new comb (Cephalopoda: Pholidoteuthidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-007-9047-9 |
| Authors |
S. O’Shea, G. Jackson, K. S. Bolstad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#353
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,228
of 78,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.