↓ Skip to main content

Intersection homology II

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, February 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Intersection homology II
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, February 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01389130
Authors

Mark Goresky, Robert MacPherson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Japan 1 2%
India 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 38 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 39%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 24 55%
Computer Science 6 14%
Physics and Astronomy 5 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,928
of 33,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.