↓ Skip to main content

Comparative bioavailability of a cisapride suppository and tablet formulation in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Comparative bioavailability of a cisapride suppository and tablet formulation in healthy volunteers
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00278595
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Hedner, J. Hedner, A. Gelin-Friberg, M. L. Huang, S. Van de Poel, R. Woestenborghs, A. Van Peer, J. Heykants

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#828
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,590
of 16,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.