↓ Skip to main content

Four new genera of the fungal family Boletaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Fungal Diversity, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
24 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Four new genera of the fungal family Boletaceae
Published in
Fungal Diversity, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13225-015-0322-0
Authors

Gang Wu, Kuan Zhao, Yan-Chun Li, Nian-Kai Zeng, Bang Feng, Roy E. Halling, Zhu L. Yang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Other 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 64%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#107
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,758
of 255,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.