| Title |
Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Structure and Function, January 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00193125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas A. Cotanche, Kenneth H. Lee, Jennifer S. Stone, Daniel A. Picard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 29% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#675
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,495
of 71,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them