↓ Skip to main content

Prairie dog alarm calls encode labels about predator colors

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,586)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
323 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Prairie dog alarm calls encode labels about predator colors
Published in
Animal Cognition, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-008-0203-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. N. Slobodchikoff, Andrea Paseka, Jennifer L. Verdolin

Abstract

Some animals have the cognitive capacity to differentiate between different species of predators and generate different alarm calls in response. However, the presence of any addition information that might be encoded into alarm calls has been largely unexplored. In the present study, three similar-sized human females walked through a Gunnison's prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) colony wearing each of three different-colored shirts: blue, green, and yellow. We recorded the alarm calls and used discriminant function analysis to assess whether the calls for the different-colored shirts were significantly different. The results showed that the alarm calls for the blue and the yellow shirts were significantly different, but the green shirt calls were not significantly different from the calls for the yellow shirt. The colors that were detected, with corresponding encoding into alarm calls, reflect the visual perceptual abilities of the prairie dogs. This study suggests that prairie dogs are able to incorporate labels about the individual characteristics of predators into their alarm calls, and that the complexity of information contained in animal alarm calls may be greater than has been previously believed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 9%
Canada 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 142 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Student > Bachelor 39 23%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 49%
Psychology 30 18%
Computer Science 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 276. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#131,809
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#44
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330
of 184,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them