| Title |
Plant-based Rasayana drugs from Ayurveda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11655-011-0659-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Subramani Paranthaman Balasubramani, Padma Venkatasubramanian, Subrahmanya Kumar Kukkupuni, Bhushan Patwardhan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#156
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,263
of 108,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.