↓ Skip to main content

Bacteria, fungi and biokarst in Lechuguilla Cave, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bacteria, fungi and biokarst in Lechuguilla Cave, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico
Published in
Environmental Geology, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01061824
Authors

K. I. Cunningham, D. E. Northup, R. M. Pollastro, W. G. Wright, E. J. LaRock

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#68
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,350
of 76,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them