| Title |
Far field damage on RC buildings: the case study of Navelli during the L’Aquila (Italy) seismic sequence, 2009
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10518-010-9201-y |
| Authors |
M. Mucciarelli, M. Bianca, R. Ditommaso, M. R. Gallipoli, A. Masi, C. Milkereit, S. Parolai, M. Picozzi, M. Vona |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#80
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,775
of 94,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them