↓ Skip to main content

Phytoplankton Patterns in Massachusetts Bay—1992–2007

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Phytoplankton Patterns in Massachusetts Bay—1992–2007
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12237-008-9125-9
Authors

Carlton D. Hunt, David G. Borkman, P. Scott Libby, Richard Lacouture, Jefferson T. Turner, Michael J. Mickelson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 44%
Environmental Science 15 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 13%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#378
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,577
of 174,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.