↓ Skip to main content

The MAP test for multimodality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Classification, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
The MAP test for multimodality
Published in
Journal of Classification, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01201021
Authors

Gregory Paul M. Rozál, J. A. Hartigan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
France 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 25%
Linguistics 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Classification
#30
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,497
of 22,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Classification
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them