↓ Skip to main content

Role of Monitoring Devices in Preventing Heart Failure Admissions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Role of Monitoring Devices in Preventing Heart Failure Admissions
Published in
Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11897-015-0262-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth McDonald, Mark Wilkinson, Mark Ledwidge

Abstract

This review aims to discuss and summarize the evidence base for devices that have a role in monitoring patients with heart failure for the purpose of attempting to prevent heart failure-related admissions. Despite contemporary heart failure service provision, many patients continue to need acute admission for decompensation. There is a clinical need for a better strategy for predicting decompensation earlier so that appropriate therapeutic interventions can be commenced sooner in order to prevent the need for acute hospital admission. Between clinical assessment visits, the contemporary approach to management is based primarily on daily home monitoring of weight by patients; while this has proved useful, it falls short. For example, substantial weight gain was seen in only 20 % of ADHF admission patients according to data collected in the TEN-HMS home telemonitoring study. Monitoring devices offer the possibility of tracking additional physiological or haemodynamic parameters that may allow for earlier detection and more accurate identification of patients at risk of acute decompensation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,927,921
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Current Heart Failure Reports
#236
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,240
of 271,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Heart Failure Reports
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.