↓ Skip to main content

Circumstellar envelopes and Asymptotic Giant Branch stars

Overview of attention for article published in The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
366 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Circumstellar envelopes and Asymptotic Giant Branch stars
Published in
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/pl00013287
Authors

H.J. Habing

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 34 72%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
#89
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,401
of 26,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them