| Title |
On the rules of intermediate logics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archive for Mathematical Logic, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00153-006-0320-8 |
| Authors |
Rosalie Iemhoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2008.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Archive for Mathematical Logic
#30
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,777
of 155,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for Mathematical Logic
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them