↓ Skip to main content

Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis ofNereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, October 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis ofNereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies
Published in
Marine Biology, October 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02112137
Authors

M. A. R. Koehl, R. S. Alberte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 46%
Environmental Science 15 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,776
of 13,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.