Title |
A tutorial on variational Bayesian inference
|
---|---|
Published in |
Artificial Intelligence Review, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10462-011-9236-8 |
Authors |
Charles W. Fox, Stephen J. Roberts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 717 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 1% |
China | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 2% |
Unknown | 680 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 228 | 32% |
Researcher | 104 | 15% |
Student > Master | 104 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 49 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 4% |
Other | 96 | 13% |
Unknown | 105 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 269 | 38% |
Engineering | 126 | 18% |
Mathematics | 58 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 3% |
Other | 87 | 12% |
Unknown | 133 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence Review
#161
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,327
of 113,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence Review
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.