| Title |
Intra-Arterial Calcium Gluconate Treatment After Hydrofluoric Acid Burn of the Hand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-008-9361-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Thomas, U. Jaeger, I. Sagoschen, C. Lamberti, K. Wilhelm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 45% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,717,448
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#681
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,374
of 84,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.